I think there's one risk that occurs to me when I look at the language. If a court, at the time of sentencing, has in mind the Internet, we all have a common understanding of what that means, but if there are other networks that we don't turn our minds to because we don't think about them as distinct from the Internet.... In the undertaking, the example given would be a land area network that's just within a close geographic area.
If you don't specify that, then the question is, was the intention for that condition to apply to it? If the court only specifies “the Internet” because they don't know what other networks might exist, is there a bit of an opportunity to lose the benefit of the condition? I think there is a risk.