I think that's a possible interpretation. I'm just trying to assist the committee in the sense of explaining what the intention is, how the wording works or could be interpreted.... Obviously, I'm not in a position to say it will necessarily...that the risk will materialize or that a court wouldn't be so inclined to interpret it, because as I say, if you read it all together, the provision already says unless the offender does so in accordance with the conditions set by the court, so the direction is there to the courts.
Does this help the court more? It certainly could, but as you say, I still think there is more risk. The question is, is that a big risk?