Well, I think my comments are fairly similar. As opposed to Mr. Dechert's viewpoint of this amendment, it seems to me that what we're doing is just the opposite. We're saying to the judiciary, “You have this additional authority and we would like you to use it”.
Mr. Lemay's point is very well taken in terms of the convicted person knowing what they can't do, but it also allows the judges to be very specific. If we do get that new technology, I believe the wording--the government wording in the existing bill, plus this amendment--would allow the court to say that it's not just the Internet, that it's this whole new system, and you're not allowed to use that either, except under these conditions. That's really the way I see this amendment and why I think we should support it.