My understanding is that this wording, this proposal, really flows from the Nunn commission report. My recollection is the case that gave rise to the Nunn commission in the first place was one of a young person who had a history of stealing cars. After he was charged with stealing one car, he stole another car, and in the commission of the second offence he killed somebody. That's theft of property. The car might have been worth only a few hundred dollars, but it was used in a way that ended up killing someone. That's what gave rise to the whole Nunn commission, which resulted in these proposals and Bill C-4.
On March 9th, 2011. See this statement in context.