A youth commits an offence, is found guilty, and is sentenced to custody. We know, because we've just discussed what the bar for that is, what the judge must consider. We're seeing that non-violent cases resulted in a higher degree of custody than violent cases. Then in 2008-09, that inverses itself so that, as I would have expected, violent cases outstrip non-violent cases.
Can you explain why the two roles reversed? It would seem to me that violent cases would result in custody more often than non-violent cases. Is there an explanation for that?