I don't think I said that; we recognize we'd have to have a lawful intercept order in place--part VI--in order to intercept private communication.
What we're saying is to have the ability to do it.... Subscriber information is not available in regard to just straight out who has what number; currently it's not easy to obtain, and yet it's information that should be easy to obtain. The simple information around who is registered to a particular phone should just be public information or should be easy to obtain for the police.
Secondly, it's to have access, or in other words, to be able to access with the lawful authorities. Some of the technology that's out there is absolutely critical. Currently we don't have that. It's just not where it should be, that requirement for technology companies to have access to some of the technology that exists out there, such that when the police have a lawful order, they can access the information that's required. It's not there.