I would agree with that. In many cases, I think, when defence counsel receives the hard drive, which is really what amounts to a truckload of paper, they are not in a position with their own resources in their own offices to adequately digest all of that information.
Defence counsel will have to speak to this, but my view of the procedural bogging down that it causes is that unless something is changed this will continue. In some cases, it can be a useful tool to defence to basically cause one of these large cases to go on either until we get to a delay problem or, as I mentioned with one case, until a case is crushed under its own weight.