Yes, this part of the bill has never been reviewed clause by clause.
I did not feel that anyone here has tried to monopolize the discussion in any way whatsoever. This is being done in all intellectual honesty, at least on this side of the table, in order to improve the bill.
I take some issue with this attempt to make us swallow, as if it were just a question of math, 208 clauses over 109 pages dealing with nine fundamental pieces of legislation that are going to change our whole criminal justice system in a number of ways. It will take the time it is going to take, but at least we will be able to leave here saying that we did what we had to do to get the job done.
If my colleague opposite really feels that someone is trying to take up all the time and prevent matters from moving forward, we can talk about that later. I personally feel that the current discussions are very important and are worth pursuing by the committee.