Thank you very much.
I'm happy that the government proposal in Bill C-10 maintains the requirement that only restrictions that are necessary should be permitted. I'm certain that this is something that would be a constitutional requirement.
However, once we determine that a restriction is necessary, I believe it is unnecessary to parse further whether there may be a less restrictive necessary condition. I think it can create a lot of difficulty for corrections people to try to second-guess what might be the least restrictive of necessary conditions. The necessity is a real requirement, in my view, and that is maintained in the government proposal.
Thank you.