Yes, exactly, especially since I was at only the third of my five minutes. So why invoke a point of order on something that had nothing to do with what I was saying?
Overall, we are against this because this is a complete shift that is distancing us from what the concept of a pardon was previously based on, which was linked to rehabilitation. We need to keep in mind that the people targeted by this have already paid their debt to society and that they have served their sentences, either in prison or elsewhere.
So that is the basis for most of the amendments we are putting forward for this part. This is why, with this amendment, we are asking that the two lines in question be removed. That's all.