Very well.
One clause in particular concerns me. Vigilante groups always worry me a bit. It is always worrying when you see people taking justice into their own hands, with the dramatic consequences that that can have.
I also have another concern. Subsection 3(1) contains the following words: “or a person authorized by the owner”. I wonder who they are referring to in that passage.
According to me, the term “person authorized by the owner” and the fact that this can be done in a reasonable period of time is a problem. In fact, don't you think that the expression “within a reasonable time after the offence” is a rather vague expression? I am having trouble understanding this. Once again, the vaguer the text, the greater the leeway the defence will have to invoke all sorts of arguments.
I would like some reassurance in this regard.