Thank you, Chair.
Thank you, Mr. Minister, for joining us today. We welcome the attempt to clarify the law of self-defence. I call it that because I guess our job is to have a good look at it and try to ensure that it does result in clarification, not in another series of decades or whatever of court interpretation.
On that score, in setting forth the examples, such as, for example, the factors in proposed subsection 34(2)—it's a non-exhaustive list of factors, as you pointed out—to be considered, are you satisfied that the current case law as it has existed over the last hundred years will still be useful and valid in helping to determine what's reasonable in terms of self-defence and that in fact all this is doing is clarifying the application of that?