No, and this is why these have to be very careful. You don't want to be stereotyping, and you don't want to be subjecting people's opinions to prejudices and that sort of thing. So no, I don't think that would be appropriate. One of the provisions, as you'll notice, in there on self-defence is the previous relationship. If an individual knows this individual to be violent, or they've been the subject of the violence themselves, that adds to the reasonableness of them taking steps to protect themselves from an individual such as that.
So it is a non-exhaustive list, but no, we can't and should never get into the idea of profiling people strictly on the basis of some prejudice that an individual may have. We don't want to go there, and this is why the bill is carefully drafted. It may be more reasonable for you to take steps if you have been a victim of violence from this individual, but again, in the absence of something like that, we have to be very careful. We can't legislate people's ability to claim a protection either because of their stereotypes or their prejudices against any particular individual or group.