I don't think so. Again, if you look carefully at the section on citizen's arrest, as I am sure you are doing and will continue to do, we indicate that the person who has actually witnessed this—they haven't got it second- or third-hand that a crime had been committed and then they're getting involved with citizen's arrest—must be present to see the crime, but within a reasonable period of time after that they apprehend the individual.
I think it was fairly carefully crafted in that regard. I would be concerned that if a person believed that somebody had committed a crime at any time or anywhere and hadn't actually witnessed it themselves, it might lead to the situation you describe.
Again, it's very careful. I don't expect any increase of “vigilantism” as a result of this. As I say, it's carefully crafted, but it expands the ability of an individual who has been victimized or has witnessed a crime of this type to be able to do something about it.
But again, as you know, and that's part of the provision as well, you are to turn this individual over to a law enforcement agency as soon as possible. I think that's appropriate. This is what we want.