Again, in putting this bill together we heard from a number of different sources that people everywhere want to have a fair but expeditious hearing of the issues. It seems to me that if that decision has been made and it's perfectly applicable to the instance, it's appropriate for that to continue. But that could be challenged. We don't close the door for individuals, but we direct the judges to make that decision as they deem appropriate. So yes, we give that discretion to the judiciary, and I think it will work well.
On June 21st, 2011. See this statement in context.