At the very least, it causes the judge or the jury to specifically put their minds to each of these points. It would be in the instructions. I just have to say that I'm okay with it. And it's often that the shoe is on the other foot. We often get witnesses coming here to tell us to give judges more discretion. In this case, we're giving them a little discretion, and I'm okay with it. I will have to leave it for you to ponder, perhaps.
I have one more question, if I have time, for Superintendent Preston. The issue is that right now, as I understand it, if people are charged with an offence because they were trying to defend themselves or were trying to arrest someone who had committed an offence against them, it may often be the case that the law is so unclear that the police, just as a default position, have to charge such individuals and let the courts sort it out. My impression is that these amendments will perhaps avoid the necessity of some of those charges. Does that seem right to you?