Right, but the concept of the more you remove it from a very narrow fact scenario, where you have a shopkeeper who's arresting somebody immediately found committing a crime and holding them for police, and let's say the courts are probably going to find that does not create charter obligations, the concern from our perspective is that the changes in the law allowing a broader period of arrest.... And I should point out that this law does not restrict itself to honest shopkeepers who are arresting shoplifters; it applies broadly to any offence--a security guard, for example, arresting somebody a few hours later off the property. The concern is that this does not automatically create charter obligations, where from our perspective we believe it should.
The more you get away from the private single citizen, like Mr. Chen, to a more corporatized private security environment, the more the Criminal Lawyers' Association feels that charter obligations ought to be engaged.