Thank you.
My second question once again is for the representatives of the Barreau du Québec.
Your brief states the following:
The Barreau du Québec is of the opinion that the proposed amendment results in more disadvantages than solutions, and that it would be preferable not to enact it. Section 494(1) Criminal Code should remain as it currently stands. We believe that an approach based on protecting the safety of individuals, including both the offender and victim of theft or property damage who enforces the law, is vastly preferable to an approach that could endanger individuals' safety
You addressed the subject, but I would like you to develop your idea on this point a little further.