Okay.
Secondly, a common theme, not unrelated to the first, is that the legislation, as you and others have mentioned, really has an impact with respect to the private security sector, that in fact it may expand the powers inadvertently re the private security sector, although it was related to David Chen. So the model we are using for the legislation relates to Chen, but the fallout will be expanded powers for the private security sector.
Is there something we need to do with regard to this legislation regarding accountability for the private security sector, since we're legislating regarding David Chen but may be missing the consequential fallout to what we need to be legislating about?
The question is to any of you and all of you.