I don't think the courts will make that distinction prior to the legislator giving them some guidance with regard to that distinction. That's my sense. I'm not sure they think in those terms. My sense is that this legislation has the Chen case as its kind of underpinning scenario. What I'm still trying to see is whether, given that the Chen case is kind of the narrative framing of the legislation, there's anything we could do with the legislation, however it was framed by the Chen case, to somehow begin to legislatively address the issue of the security sector and its application or if we need to legislate separately with regard to it.
On March 1st, 2012. See this statement in context.