Yes. I wholeheartedly agree. And I think you've put it much better than I could.
In fact, in responding to the David Chen case, when you look at the language of the proposed amendment, it quite laudably does try to narrow the issue so as to prevent concerns of vigilantism and notions of people forming a posse to go on and enforce the law on their own.
I do agree with that comment wholeheartedly. I think it is going to overload the court. It has unforeseen consequences, namely with private security. But in the case of David Chen, it clearly was a response by Parliament to that particular issue, the way I see it.