But it's almost a mixed message, because if we say “reasonable”, we want to give the courts—if the case gets to the court's attention—the opportunity to look at what was reasonable in the circumstances of that person arresting someone who they found committing....
Obviously, if they had an opportunity the day after, and the subsequent day, and so on, to arrest and they didn't, and they did it on day three, that might not be found to have been reasonable because they had previous opportunities. But if we add in the requirement or the guidance “at the first opportunity” and “reasonable”, it's sending a confusing message about whether reasonable is only at the first opportunity. In other cases you could have—