Would you object to something being added? Do you think that adding something would be a fundamental change?
Currently, the bill suggests that paragraph 34(2)(f) be added. It reads as follows:
(f) the nature, duration and history of any relationship between the parties to the incident, including any prior use or threat of force and the nature of that force or threat;
What would you say to adding subparagraph 34(2)(f)(i), which would talk about “the person’s ability to evaluate the degree of force in the circumstances”?