If that amendment is passed, it will not change the original objective of the bill, as introduced. It would not take anything away from the bill. That is what I wanted to know. The amendment would not add a burden. You think that the courts will interpret it that way, but our amendment would remove all ambiguity. That would give the courts one less issue to decide on. Thank you for the clarification.
On March 6th, 2012. See this statement in context.