I think it would be understood that way, but we wouldn't want to add those words into the factor, because it's a non-exhaustive list of factors and we're not offering greater certainty to anything in particular. We're planting some guidelines in terms of what the factors are, but leaving it open to the courts to consider any that are relevant.
It's entirely up to the committee whether they want to add in the additional factor of the interaction or communication or leave it to be considered when it happens to be relevant in the circumstances that are presented.