Maybe for my colleagues who are better in English than I am, would somebody sending harassing e-mail, really scary ones, be considered inside of a relationship? Could we see it as written in proposed paragraph 34(2)(f) already, without adding the amendment that my colleague Mr. Cotler is suggesting?
That's the only thing we were trying to cover, because “relationship” for me—maybe it's my bad understanding of the language—meant something more personal between two people. Let's say an MP, or whoever, keeps receiving really threatening e-mails and doesn't consider there's a relationship with the person whatsoever.
That's my question.