We still have “reasonable” there. We still have the “reasonable grounds”. We still have the subjective intention in the purpose of it, but if we're talking about the circumstances, the accused's understanding of those circumstances really has an awful lot to do with whether we have a full offence.
I go back to what Mr. Cotler and Madame Boivin raised. If we're dealing with what's been called battered wife syndrome, then the circumstances as perceived by the accused, the perception of the accused in these circumstances, is extremely important, because we have, normally, a pattern of behaviour that goes on and on. It's very difficult for a court or a jury to say that they are going to decide what the perception of this person was and put themselves in that person's shoes when they haven't actually been there.
I think the perception of the accused in that particular situation is rather important and ought to be given weight.