I would not support this amendment. I think proportionality is and should remain an essential element of self-defence. Again we're talking about this list of factors, and this amendment would take the nature and proportionality of the person's response right out.
It may no longer be the determinative factor, but as it is, it certainly would remain and ought to be considered in every case. To me it just makes common sense that you would look at the proportional reaction to the threat and how that was dealt with by the person. If it's deleted from the factors, it really removes it right out of consideration. I don't think that makes sense to me, so I would not support this amendment.