I just wanted to add, in echoing Mr. Woodworth somewhat, that this has been a matter of a great deal of interpretation in our jurisprudence. The courts have considered reasonableness many times.
It may be that this is coming from some testimony that the perception of persons defending themselves should be paramount, but I think it would be very dangerous and not consistent with jurisprudence so far if the “reasonable belief” portion were restricted in that way. We want to, as Ms. Klineberg said, keep both the subjective and objective elements throughout the analysis. I think it's important to do so.