The wording of the proposed amendment seems to broaden the effect, I guess. This was intended to rectify and take into account the battered woman situation, which is something we're very mindful of.
We're wondering if the wording, if it's that broad, might detract from the focus. It's difficult to predict if it would have any effect in drawing the courts' attention to the battered woman situation, which is really the primary reason for this part. I'd actually like to toss this to the experts and get their comments on it.
We did want to focus on the battered woman syndrome in this situation.