Thank you again, Mr. Chair, for the opportunity.
First of all, in relation to the MacIntosh case, a public inquiry was suggested. If I'm correct on that particular factual basis, the gentleman was in India and the court actually looked at the time away from Canada as an unreasonable delay in prosecution, and it included that time, notwithstanding that there was a warrant issued. From my perspective, instead of an inquiry, I might suggest maybe some legislative changes to make sure judges take judicial notice that they cannot include time away in part of the unreasonable trial. Would that be fair to say?