For extraterritorial jurisdiction, as I said in my opening remarks, that is something that is normally not done by a private member's bill, but in this case it's exactly what should be done.
A number of countries have already extended or included extraterritorial jurisdiction in trafficking and purposes, but I want to ask you to look at a report. The report of the practice of extraterritorial jurisdiction by Canada was released by the Law Commission of Canada and it states that most exercises of extraterritoriality are deliberately multilateral. It is open to Canada to act extraterritorially in advance of a consensus having been formed.
I think that's what you're saying, that the consensus isn't there, that we should do extraterritorially per se in a private member's bill, but—