I think the other piece to recognize too is that from a criminal law perspective, these concepts as they appear in Bill C-310, violence, force, and coercion, are roughly talking about the same thing in a criminal law context.
I don't have the amendment in front of me, but my sense from hearing the remarks is that the idea is to try to avoid potential confusion in the courts by police officers, by prosecutors. If we're talking about violence, how is that different from force? How is that different from coercion? And I think the ultimate objective, if I understand it correctly, is to provide a simplified approach that's broad enough to capture all of that conduct, not just the physical violence but the psychological tactics as well.