Absolutely. My understanding of the intent behind the bill is to really expand on and codify what the law is already.
When the trafficking offences were developed and enacted in 2005 and this test of exploitation was developed, it was meant to capture all of the conduct you've discussed, not just the physical violence but also the psychological violence—the threats of deportation, the threats of arrest. They're not familiar with the laws in Canada. They tell them, “Well, you don't have any travel documents, so if you don't do this for us, the police are going to come and arrest and deport you.” All of that conduct was meant to be included in the existing test for exploitation. It was a test designed to look at the totality of the behaviour and the effect the behaviour would have on a victim.
With regard to this fear for safety aspect, there have been some suggestions that victims have to have said that they were afraid and that this is why it's been difficult to prosecute these cases. In actual fact, the test isn't whether they were afraid but whether it would be reasonable for them to be afraid. That encompasses all of that psychological harm you're concerned about.