I understand that. I think it is very important to honour those who have defended us abroad and who have given their lives for us. My point is that we do not impose a minimum sentence on someone who commits mischief based on hate in relation to a temple or some other such place, but that we should impose such a sentence on someone who urinates on a cenotaph.
You mentioned an amendment, and I would like to know whether it will mean that these other cases would be covered.