I'm not sure where the question was there, but I'll try to get a question in so that we can actually have some testimony from our witnesses.
Madame Boivin is talking about balance. She seems to think that a mandatory minimum penalty of $1,000 is out of whack in the balance in the scheme of the offence. Perhaps, Mr. Page or Mr. Eggenberger, you could comment on whether or not you think a mandatory minimum of $1,000 shows an appropriate amount of balance for the desecration of a war memorial.
When you put it into context, at minimum wage, the person who commits that offence would have to work for maybe 40 hours to come up with that fine. Do you think 40 hours of work to come up with a $1,000 fine is an appropriate sentence for someone who has desecrated a monument that is so important to all Canadians?