Sure. I'd be happy to.
As I articulated in my submission, the whole purpose behind the Human Rights Act , as Mr. Freiman has indicated, is to help improve societies and to help change the behaviour. It's also to correct the harm that has been done. Also, it provides the ability to order to cease and desist from what has been going on—the hateful messages that have been communicated—and if necessary to provide certain compensation for the victim. That is to meet the objectives to help encourage equality, foster tolerance, and to try to get rid of discrimination and prejudice.
The penalty takes it outside of those particular objectives. It is not necessary. It is not consistent with the philosophy and underlying values. Therefore, it is no longer consistent with the objectives of the Human Rights Act. It's questionable whether the Human Rights Act should be doing it constitutionally in the first place for a matter such as this.