Thank you. I have another question for you.
In the Taylor case, the Supreme Court of Canada stressed the importance of freedom of expression, but it didn't limit its analysis to messages that are likely to be hateful. It rather tried to stress the importance of looking at a message in its overall context. This is what it said:
This analysis requires an approach sensitive to the context of a given case, it being necessary to explore the nature and scope of constitutionally entrenched human rights in light of the facts at hand.
In your opinion, what role do elements such as the context in which a statement was made and the intent of the person making the statement play in cases dealing with hate messages?