I'm very short on time.
Mr. Matas, thank you for your answer, and also Mr. Kurz.
If I could expand on some of the procedural problems, you'd also agree that on a strict interpretation of section 13 there doesn't need to be actual victims. It says it's “likely to expose a person”.
If in the view of some administrator at the Human Rights Commission it's “likely to expose”, without having any people actually complaining, that could also attract the attention of the Human Rights Commission. Would you agree?