Certainly under paragraph 279(1.1)(a) right now there is a recognition that if you use a firearm or you're aligned with a criminal organization there's a five-year minimum. But we don't recognize the fact that a child is normally not taken with a firearm, because you don't need one. Second, they're normally not aligned with a criminal organization. There's absolutely nothing.
We have to recognize that children are the most important thing in our society. If we want to go beyond that and say that the firearm and/or the criminal organization must be part of the affiliation of the conviction, we have to relook at what we've done.
If I may add, with regard to the laws that already exist, I'll give you a good example of where I'm going. In the Hebert case, which is coming for sentencing in two weeks, there has been an agreement between—