I accept that, and I think that's a good answer, but my technical concern—and maybe I'm missing something—is that the word “elder” or the word “senior” is absent from this proposed statute. It's “age and other personal circumstances”.
So, at least theoretically, a very young person who might be suffering from some sort of mental challenge or mental disability presumably could fall into the definition of someone whose age and personal circumstances require protection. That's slightly counterintuitive under a statute that's called Protecting Canada's Seniors Act.