Is there a reason? You are saying that those are the easiest personal circumstances to understand and that is why they were included in the bill. However, a parliamentary committee that is currently dealing with palliative care and compassionate care says that training has to be given to judges and prosecutors so that they can really understand and apply that type of legislation. Awareness needs to be raised among members of the legal community in terms of the seriousness of abuse problems.
Why were those two examples chosen? Why were cases that are a little less clear not included so as to ensure that those interpreting the legislation keep them in mind?