In answer to your question, my comment was that this is part of a larger approach. It's not the whole approach. I've been mentioning, of course, the changes on white collar crime and those specific sections, but those aren't the only sections that address some of the issues you have raised.
You asked about neglect. How about people who aren't getting some of the necessities of life? There are provisions within the Criminal Code. Section 215, I believe, of the Criminal Code has an 18-month maximum sentence on summary conviction or, I believe, five years for an indictable offence for people who do not provide the necessities of life when they are in a position in which they are supposed to be caring for somebody or assisting somebody and are withholding those necessities of life.
Again, you ask why we do it here. Well, this particular section deals with the grocery list of aggravating factors we ask the courts to take into account when they are sentencing an individual. But they're not the only provisions.
With respect to your specific question about the necessities of life, have a look at section 215. I think you'll see that it addresses a number of the areas you indicated. Why do we do it here? Well, over the years, this is the section of the Criminal Code that has been modified to take into consideration the priorities Canadians have and it is where we think specific mention should be made. That being said, it doesn't mean that these things were ignored in the past. It doesn't mean that at all. It is saying that these are a reflection of our priorities, but they're not the only ones.
I would refer you to section 215, and indeed the sections with respect to white collar crime. They are specific to the various ways people are taken advantage of.