We look at all aspects of the federal jurisdiction and all the constitutional elements that go into this. With respect to the Constitution of this country, it's very clear that it's the federal government that imposes the penalty with respect to violations of the Criminal Code. That being said, I wouldn't agree that in five provinces there is no availability. My understanding is that seven provinces have a fine option program. Again, as Mr. Cotler pointed out, there are variations among provinces. Even those that do not have a fine option program have procedures in place in terms of allowing the individual time to pay the fine, for instance, if it's a fine, or the surcharge, if it's a summary or indictable criminal conviction that results in imprisonment. That being said, they have procedures in place. Within a province that doesn't have a fine option program, it goes even to things like having your driver's license suspended if you continue to ignore the consequences of your criminal conviction.
In terms of the administration of it, the Constitution is very clear that where and how individuals are housed and the administration of that is within provincial jurisdiction. Again, I think this is a fair application of that. It's consistent with our constitutional responsibility to impose penalties under the Criminal Code.