Yes.
This amendment, Mr. Chairman, would suspend the collection of the surcharge if the court is satisfied that requiring the offender to immediately pay the surcharge might have a negative effect on his or her rehabilitation, again, in provinces where a fine option or a similar program is unavailable. We know the difficulties in that regard.
Mr. Chairman, I'll conclude by saying, again being very brief, that we all share the objective and know the importance of rehabilitation. As courts have found, the imposition of a financial obligation may in certain circumstances impede such rehabilitation. As such, this amendment, once again, seeks to impose the fine. It does not eliminate the requirement to pay the fine; it only suspends its collection in cases where it is demonstrated that the immediate imposition of the surcharge will have a negative impact on an offender's rehabilitation, which we all seek, Mr. Chairman.