I'm sorry, Mr. Chair, I was just using those numbers as examples. I want to make sure of the situation. Does it mean that they're ruled out of order because the other amendment passed, which didn't give consideration to Mr. Rathgeber's amendments in particular? Does that mean that the Speaker, obviously, immediately cannot consider those amendments?
That's significant, because they are not ruled out of order by the chair except on the basis that amendment NDP-1 passed.
If we look further at report stage and third reading, it talks about when a committee reports a private member's bill back to the House or is deemed to report a bill back, the order for consideration of the report stage is placed at the bottom of the order of precedence.
I am also wondering whether or not that can be changed with consent of all the parties so that we can move it to the top of precedence, if necessary.