Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Garrison says that he's not making it up, and I guess it shows up in some places.
I'd like to come back to Mr. Casey's original question, which is important here, because when we start talking about the element of subjectivity, that apparently is not found in the other definitions.
There are two elements of subjectivity in this. One is the person who is involved and the other is the public. If this passes, what is the public's responsibility? What is the public's knowledge in terms of how to determine a person's identity? What will be the factors they will be obligated to use, when this law is passed, to refrain from discriminating against someone?
If the definitions are as subjective as they seem to be, or as this one seems to be, we're going to have a very hard time answering that question.