Sure. If we're not going to go to the general public, what is their obligation? How will they know what their obligations are, with definitions that are so vague?
I ask this because I think there is something else going on here, to some extent. Mr. Garrison has said in the past that once this is in the Canadian Human Rights Act, the courts and the human rights commissions themselves will define those terms. I'm just asking if there is enough definition here so that employers will know what their obligations are, or is that going to have to be defined, as it has been in the past—and I assume from what Mr. Garrison would like to see, as it will be in the future—by human rights commissions and the courts?
If that's the case, then the definition is too vague.