Yes. As I indicated to you, there is a military exclusionary clause. In essence, the activities of the armed forces as those terms are understood under international law and as governed by that law will not be reformed by the government by the proposed changes to the Criminal Code. The amendments don't directly apply to the activities of the Canadian armed forces and those acting in support of them who are under the formal command and control of Canadian armed forces while in the performance of their duties.
The military exclusion language used in both the treaties, as you will see when you examine them, is similar to that used in the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, which is implemented in Canada under the Criminal Code. That's another area that you might want to have a look at, but I wanted to make sure it was part of the record so that you are aware of it.
Thank you for raising it specifically, but again, it's consistent with the language in those treaties and in others.