Furthermore, with regard to section 2 of the charter, and specific to paragraph 2(b)—and for those who have a code, it is on page 1806—it refers to Regina v. Keegstra, in 1990. The ruling at the time was:
...the level of protection to which expression may be entitled will vary with the nature of the expression. The further that expression is from the core values of this right [as with the offence of defamation] the greater will be the ability to justify the state's restrictive action.
That was also followed with Regina v. Lucas.
Is there a concern by you, or have you thought about the possibility, that the Canadian constitutional perspective with regard to paragraph 2(b) may be prone to being overreached?